Do Airplanes Allow Electronic Cigarettes?

Do Airplanes Allow Electronic Cigarettes? This is the question among many smokers who have discovered the benefits of electronic cigarettes as they are boldly smoking in areas no other smoker has ever smoked. They’re smoking in bars, restaurants and even airports. Most e-smokers have gained the courage to do so considering that there are no clearly laid down policies regarding smoking e-cigs on-board. For more about electronic cigarettes, check out the Best Electronic Cigarette Blog.

Do Airplanes Allow Electronic Cigarettes?

This has become a controversial topic. Some airports have come out boldly to include the e-cigarette smoking in their “no smoking rule”. However, not all airports have done the same. Surprisingly a large number of airports have neither banned it nor allowed it. They have made it an outspoken rule stuff. FAA rules and regulations prohibit smoking a lighted cigarette or any other thing that produces smoke. They have not so far issued any regulation against cigarette smoking. For this reason, e-cigarette smoking is not illegal but is only against company policy with the latter being enforced by the friendly flight attendant. There are only three airlines that have come out clearly to address this issue. These are Japan airlines, AirTran and KLM.


It’s a good practice to check with the airport on their stand regarding e-cigarette smoking. Some smokers have had their e-cigarette liquids confiscated by security while trying to bring them on board. Maybe they failed to adhere to the airlines regulations regarding the carrying of liquids. Carrying disposable e-cigarette or the new 2-part electronic cigarette is preferred. South Beach Smoke, Premium Electronic Cigarette, Vapor Couture Designer E-Cigarettes for Women. V2 cigs and Green Smoke all offer this.


BE COOL – The key factor to smoking on an airplane is keeping a low profile. Some electronic cigarette smokers have been able to successfully smoke on airlines where there are no clear regulations on e-cig smoking.

SMOKE DESIGNER E-CIGS – Premium electronic cigarette and Green Smoke offer e-cigs with designer colors hence they do not look real. Show it to your flight attendant and your neighbor on-board.

3. MAKE FRIENDS WITH THE FLIGHT ATTENDANT – Try and exchange pleasantries with the flight attendant prior to asking him or her whether you can use your classy e-cig on board.

4. SIT IN BUSINESS OR FIRST CLASS – You will have a better chance of getting in touch with your flight attendant and obtaining his or her permission as they are providing you with the attention expected.


Take an Electronic Cigarette on your Next Trip to Disney World

Taking a trip to Disney world can be so much fun with the kids as a parent, guardian or custodian. It might also be a bit of an inconvenience for you if you are a smoker and have cravings that get better of you. There are parents that will not mind their children seeing them smoke and those that will have strict rules against the same. Both parents will be faced with a quagmire especially if one is a chain smoker. This simply means that one will be unable to make long tips without taking a puff along the way.

If you are careful about secondary smoking for the kids, you will have to stop and do it out of the car. If you are careful about the kids seeing you smoke, this will be a lot tougher. There are however ways one can smoke today without having to put themselves and anyone else in harm’s way. Electronic cigarettes have revolutionized smoking. The fact that you can still get the same high the tobacco cigarette gives without the kids having to deal with the effects of the tobacco is welcome news for many parents. Here are a few reasons Why Electronic Cigarettes Are Better for a Trip to Disney World with the Family or any other place. (By the way, if you’re interested in reading about the best electronic cigarette brands, visit this website.)

One of the best attributes of the electronic cigarettes is the fact that they are smokeless. They use butyl liquid to vaporize the nicotine which is only inhaled by the user. The vapor that is released into the atmosphere at any given time is environmental friendly and hence harmless to any kids whether in the car, house or a public place.

The cigarettes do not come with an odor. They in fact have different flavors that smell great with the same kick off nicotine. This gives the user with a fresh and pleasant breathe that is great for being around kids. The fact that your kids and car will not smell like tobacco is a good thing for you and anyone else using the car.

Tobacco is quite harmful even to the secondary smoker. The fumes and smoke are full of chemicals that can affect the respiratory system of a child. Tobacco is said to have more than 400 chemicals that will damage the body in one way or another. The best thing about electronic cigarettes is that they do not have anything that would harm anyone as a secondary smoker. This makes them ideal for use even around kids.

The fact that these cigarettes do not use matches to light makes them ideal. Unlike tobacco cigarettes, they use a rechargeable battery which also makes them safe around curious children that would have a go at matches and even for you having a lighted cigarette in the car with children.

Electronic cigarettes simply give you and those around you a peace of mind wherever you are or go.


A shopper’s guide to incentive travellers checks Part 3

Cruises: Good for prepayment of cruises on 16 different ship lines, including Cunard, Norwegian Caribbean, Royal Viking, and Delta Queen Steamboat.

Hotels: GoldChex can be used for lodging, food and beverage, recreation, taxes, and gratuities at 190 U.S. hotels (mostly Marriotts), 36 of which are resorts. To spend GoldChex at a member hotel, however, a winner must be a registered guest there. The checks are used to settle the account at checkout.

Other travel options: GoldChex can be used to prepay wilderness tours offered by American Wilderness Experience, or can be exchanged for Kampgrounds of America (KOA) coupons that allow winners access to more than 700 KOA campsites nationwide. The GoldChex 1985 catalogue will also offer Lynn Jachney Yacht Charters, Baseball Fantasies Fulfilled, and Outward Bound wilderness training.

Car rentals: Twenty car-rental companies are on GoldChex’s roster, but rental arrangements can be made only through American Airlines in conjunction with air travel arrangements. GoldChex are not accepted at any car rental counters.

Merchandise: None offered.

Promotional materials: All contest participants receive four-color catalogues with listings, pictures, and descriptions (some full-page) of most properties and tour opportunities. Sponsor company pays for these by quantity. In addition, Original sends winners a bimonthly Gold-Rush newsletter updating new properties and features for the entire three-year life of the checks. A slide presentation is available free to companies for contest kickoffs.

Cost: Contest sponsor sends Original a check up front for the dollar amount of GoldChex he requires. Original then bills him for a service charge of 3% — 5%, depending on the size of his order. Catalogues extra. TravPass S&H Motivation Hillside, IL

Checks are available in $10 denominations only (like phenibut). Checks are nonpersonalized and transferable but cannot be replaced if lost or stolen. Another advantage of transferable checks, says S&H’s vice president of marketing services Steve Erickson, is that they don’t have to be held by the issuer for personalization, so a contest sponsor can “get a program on the street in a matter of days.” TravPass checks are good for only one year, but S&H plans to extend check life to two years in 1985.

Air travel: TravPass may be used toward air fare at any United Airlines ticket location, making it the only check that allows a winner to buy airline tickets at a moment’s notice. The catch is that they must be United tickets unless United does not fly to the destination chosen. S&H will make reservations on other airlines for winners who have time enough to send them their TravPass checks.


A shopper’s guide to incentive travellers checks Part 2

The niggling among travellers check suppliers begins with the monetary denominations of the checks they issue. GoldChex, for instance, come in $25 and $50 denominations, while TravPass checks are offered in $10 amounts only, and Maritz’s Exclusively Yours Cheques come in $10 and $50. Barlow of Original says that larger denominations decrease the amount of paper that, say, a $1,000 winner will have to tote around. But John Jack, a vice president of Business Incentives (BI), which markets A La Carte Cheques, says that $10 checks cut down on a winner’s out-of-pocket expenses. “If a guy with GoldChex gets a hotel bill of $85, he’s going to have to use four $25 checks to pay and lose $15 of value,” says Jack, noting that no change is given when paying with such travellers checks. “He can also dig into his own pocket to pay the $10 difference, but we want to avoid that.”

Original is also the only company to send checks directly to each winner with his name printed on each check. That way, if a winner loses any checks, he can call a toll-free number to have them replaced. All of the other companies leave winners’ names off the checks to make them transferable. “This allows dealers and distributors to pass their checks along to their salespeople,” says Jack. “And if a winner has a kid at school, he can just send him the checks to use.” GoldChex are transferable, but a winner must return them to Original to have the name changed.

These are just a few of the things incentive travellers check purveyors don’t agree on. Some allow winners to spend checks on merchandise, others don’t. Some offer camping vacations, others think that’s silly. They don’t agree on spelling, either, offering variously “checks,” “cheques,” or “chex.” To help incentive shoppers choose from the five different products available, S&MM presents the following rundown on the features, regulations, and costs of each. GoldChex Original Incentives Cincinnati

Checks come in $25 and $50 denominations. Personalized with name of winner, who can call a toll-free number (like dentist novi) to have them replaced if they’re lost or stolen. Transferral of checks of another person is possible, but checks must be sent back to Original to be reissued. GoldChex are good for three years.

Air travel: Reservations must be made by calling American Airlines toll-free. American flights, therefore, are the ones presented first to GoldChex winners, though people are free to ask the American resevationist for alternate flights and prices. GoldChex may constitute any portion of payment for tickets, but all payments that include checks must be sent to Original’s headquarters 30 days before departure date. Tickets are mailed on receipt of payment.

Tour packages: Domestic and international tours arranged by Liberty Tours, Paramus, NJ, can be paid for with GoldChex. Tickets and travel documents are not mailed until full payment is received by Liberty.


A shopper’s guide to incentive travellers checks Part 1

It was one of those ideas that made incentive suppliers across the country wonder, “Why didn’t I think of that?”

When incentive travellers checks hit the market two years ago, it was a product truly new to the incentive industry. Unlike typical incentive travel programs in which the top 10%-20% of salespeople or dealers win company-planned trips to a single location on a single set of dates, travellers checks allow individual winners to pick their own dates and destinations. Also, since checks are awarded in denominations ranging from $10 to $50, companies that opt for them can award them to any salesperson who registers any increase in his sales–a concept that contradicts the notion of the “elite” incentivetravel winner.

“Most incentive travel contests have a de-motivating impact,” says Rick Barlow, who three years ago founded Original Incentives to market the first incentive travellers check, GoldChex. “On the first day a group travel contest is announced, 80% of the sales force knows they’re not going to win.”

A sales veteran of American Express like the Facebook marketing tips, as well as of motivational giants Maritz and Business Incentives, Barlow saw that incentive travel suppliers were losing out to merchandise when it came to awarding low-level winners. He says that the success of the many airline frequent flyer programs proved to him that incentive travellers checks could work. “The airline promotions showed us the power of travel in small pieces,” he says.

Brad forsythe, Original’s vice president of marketing, says that what the company did was to “take travel and package it like merchandise.” Original supplies all GoldChex winners with a catalogue featuring hotel, resorts, cruise lines, campgrounds, airlines, and car-rental companies that honor the checks. The winner then tailors his own incentive trip. “You can look at the catalogue and set your own goal,” says Forsythe. “Incentive travel was supposed to be a week in Acapulco, but we found we have people going to Syracuse or Pittsburgh to visit Mom.”

Shortly after the debut of GoldChex, S&H Motivation introduced its own version, TravPass. Then, in the last year and a half, similar products appeared from Maritz, Business Incentives, and E.F. MacDonald. All programs differ slightly from the others and, of course, each company professes the superiority of its product.


General Outlook of Hawaii Tourism Part 2

Industry members cite other factors that  has in its favor–an improved economy; increased travel overall, and cold mainland weather. In addition, the summer Olympic Games in Los Angeles should provide a spin-off for the islands.

Hotels’ occupancies should benefit from the fact that few new properties are coming onto the market, and the Hawaii Visitors Bureau reports an estimated increase in meeting and conventions this year: 246,000 attendees this compared with 226,000 in 1983.

The Hawaii Visitors Bureau is estimating that there will be a 3% to 4% increase in tourists this year. For 1983, it projected a 4% to 5% increase; the state department of planning projected a 7% increase but numbers came in lower.

For the first 10 months of last year, the latest figures available from the Hawaii Visitors Bureau, 3.6 million visitors came to Hawaii, up 2.4% from the period in 1982. The year will probably end with a 3% increase at the most. The industryregards 1983 as a disappointing year.

Virtually the only mainland region that was down for the 10-month period was the mid-Atlantic states with a 16.4% decline. This was due mainly to the high fares and competition last winter.

Last winter, Canadian visitors (about 7% of the total market) were down more than 20%. This segment now looks stronger than it has in several years. Carriers have lower fares, charter series are strong, especially to Maui, and there is a new airline in the Vancouver-Honolulu market, South Pacific Island Airways.

The Japanese market (16% of the total market) has been growing overall, but not to Hawaii. New competing destinations, such as Fiji and Australia, have been opened up for the Japanese.

To combat the soft Japanese market, JAL, which brings in about half the Japanese tourists, is embarking on a $2.4 million advertising campaign in Japan to promote the neighbor islands.

United Airlines, with the neighbor island counties and resort destination associations, next month will start a $3 million television and print media campaign.

These promotions and United’s direct flights to Maui and Kona, which it started last year, will place the neighbor islands in a strong position for growth. The campaign with United marks the first time that the neigbor island counties have joined together in a cooperative campaign.

What happens after the winter in Hawaii depends very much on what happens with the air fares. In the summer, the West Coast market is important and one of the two low-cost carriers instrumental in driving down fares in 1982 and keeping them fairly low, The Hawaii Express, ended operations in December.

Last summer, West Coast business was lost because airlines were slow in bringing in lower fares when the period started to look soft – like the worst electronic cigarette brands. Europe then was providing Hawaii with tough competition.

General Outlook of Hawaii Tourism Part 1

HONOLULU — Hawaii is looking forward to a strong first quarter of 1984, the peak season of the year.

All the ingredients necessary are in place, especially the most important one — price. A Hawaii vacation should now be less expensive than it was a year ago.

Last winter, airlines to Hawaii saw a drop in business from the East Coast partly because of higher fares. Also responsible was increased competition from Mexico, which siphoned off potential Hawaii traffic because of its devalued peso.

This year, however, Hawaii’s tourism interests do not consider Mexico as much of a threat. Mexico’s land prices reportedly have increased, and Hawaii is more competitive.

Interisland fares, at presstime, were down from those of a year ago because of a fare war that started in December and continued into January. The three interisland carriers, now in better financial shape, were jockeying for market position, each vowing not to be undercut by the others.

Car rental rates also are down from a year ago, mainly because of an oversupply of vehicles. Rates are changing constantly, something that rarely happens at the start of peak season.

Wholesale package prices from distant markets are down because fares are down.

One tour operator, for example, has a lead price of $469 for a one-week package in Waikiki, including air from New York; a year ago its lead was $525. In addition, the company’s lead package from Chicago is $127 less than it was a year ago, and from Cleveland, $237 less. Many pilots figuring out how to pass a drug test has resulted in this lowering of prices!

West Coast packages and air fares remain competitive, perhaps slightly ahead in price from a year ago. One-week lead progrms from Los Angeles were $299 at presstime. But West Coast business to Hawaii is slow at this time and Hawaii depends more on the cold-weather markets.

Hoteliers and wholesalers report that bookings are well ahead of those of last year at this time, although booking lead times continue to get shorter making predictions difficult for many.


Justice Dept. Foresees Smooth CAB Transfer Part 3

Seiden’s unit, which overseas rail, bus, truck and barge transportation, as well as air, would probably not develop a specialized aviation unit per se.

If certain cases required a hearing, Seiden said a law judge would be used “when appropriate,” and that the Justice Department attorneys who participate in the hearing in an adversary role would refrain from advising the ultimate decision-maker.

this so-called “separation of functions” is a requirement for regulatory agencies such as the CAB, and Seiden said the Justice Department would be bound by it and by related due process rules.

One argument for transferring the antitrust powers to the Transportation Department, rather than Justice, is the notion that Transportation specialists, rather than antitrust lawyers, should have the job of assessing agreements or mergers for their transportation benefits.

Seiden made light of that argument, saying, “I don’t doubt our ability to deal with transportation issues.” The Justice Department, he said, was active in drafting the deregulating act and has closely cooperated with the CAB and the State and Transportation departments on numerous air transportation issues over the years.

“In order to make informed decisions, you need experts–and we’re experts,” Seiden said. “We’re not just cops. We’re advocates of competition, and if laws or practices stifle competition, we seek to change them.”

He cited as one example a recent decision by the department to facilitate joint research and development projects among American firms, a decision that included antitrust immunity for the participants.


Elliot Seiden, chief of the transportation section of the Justice Department, expects the transfer of the Civil Aeronautics Board antitrust powers to that department to go smoothly. Key concerns of the airline and travel agency communities are that ATC and IATA agency accreditation programs and rate agreements will no longer be used, however Seiden reports that the Justice Department encourages industries to develop their own standards and procedures. Antitrust immunity should not be necessary for most airline agreements.


Justice Dept. Foresees Smooth CAB Transfer Part 2

He said that the Justice Department generally endorses the airlines’ agency accreditation schemes, just as it allows otherindustries to develop common standards and procedures.

With exclusively eliminated, in accordance with the CAB’s decision, “there’s nothing left for us to do,” Seiden said. “I think that issue is completely resolved.”

As for IATA, Seiden said that it is established U.S. policy that antitrust immunity will continue as long as European governments adhere to a multilateral agreement on pricing zones. “We strongly support that concept,” he said.

Generally speaking, Seiden indicated that the debate over antitrust immunity has been blown out of proportion. “It’s a bit of a red herring,” he said, adding that antitrust immunity simply is not necessary for most airline agreements.

Under the law, agreements that are anticompetitive cannot be approved by the CAB or its successor unless there are overriding transportation or public interest benefits. Seiden said he has reviewed CAB decisions of recent years and has found no anticompetitive agreements that received CAB approval because of their overriding benefits.

The agreements that have received CAB approval, in other words, were approved because they were not anticompetitive, Seiden said.

Such agreements, he concluded, normally do not need antitrust immunity to protect the parties from prosecution by the Justice Department. Industry proponents of antitrust immunity also claim, however, that immunity protects them from third-party damage suits. Without that protection, it is argued, some agreements would fall apart.

Seiden said that “if there were a legitimate risk to a beneficial activity, we’d immunize,” but he added that the threat of lawsuits is present everywhere else in the economy, and that many joint enterprises in other industries have flourished without immunity.

As for the mechanics of administering the CAB’s powers–which also would include authority over airline mergers–Seiden said he expects his transportation section, consisting of 24 attorneys, to acquire as many as 20 CAB employes.


Justice Dept. Foresees Smooth CAB Transfer Part 1

WASHINGTON–The Justice Department, slated to inherit the CAB’s antitrust powers at the end of this year, has begun internal preparations for the transfer, while trying to convince the airlines that, in the words of one official, “we’re not just cops.”

Elliott Seiden, chief of the transportation section of the department’s antitrust division, told Travel Weekly that he expects Jan. 1, 1985–the date of the transfer–to “come and go without so much as a blink.”

“We won’t do things any differently” as far as the CAB’s traditional antitrust policies are concerned, he said.

Seiden and other Justice Department officials have offered similar reassurances to airline officials in a series of recent meetings with individual carriers and with the Air Transport Association.

One purpose of those meetings has been to brief the industry on the department’s plans and to muster support for the Reagan administration’s plan to accomplish the sunset of the CAB without further congressional action.

Since the deregulation act was passed in 1978, however, many airlines and other industry groups have held to the view that the power to confer antitrust immunity should be transferred instead to the Transportation Department.

In an industry that has antitrust immunity for many of its agreements and working relationships, giving the immunity power to the government’s antitrust enforcers would be like giving the fox the key to the henhouse, as some observers have put it.

Among the key concerns are the fears in the airline and travel agency communities that the ATC and IATA agency programs might be jeopardized, or that antitrust immunity for IATA rate agreements might be similarly threatened.

Seiden disagrees. “I don’t think the travel agency program is going to be affected one way or the other” by a transfer of the immunity power to the Justice Department, he said.

He noted that the future of those agency programs will be shaped by the CAB’s competitive marketing decision. Assuming that it is not overturned by the courts or by Congress, Seiden said there is no reason to believe that the Justice or Transportation Departments would disturb the decision.